Search Icon White
News Cover Image

ANSI and ULSE Publish Principles for Measuring the Impact of Voluntary Consensus Standards on Human Health and Safety

8/10/2023

The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and UL Standards & Engagement announced today the publication of a white paper Principles for Measuring the Impact of Voluntary Consensus Standards on Human Health and Safety. The white paper provides a methodology on how to measure and articulate the significant impacts that voluntary consensus standards can have on the health and safety of the public. It was developed by a working group that included representatives of U.S. federal government agencies, standards developing organizations, and others.

Voluntary consensus standards for health and safety are diverse in their scope, technical approach, industry, and user base. This variation between standards imposes limits on the ability to specify one single approach to measuring the impact of standards on health and safety. The working group focused on a set of concepts, frameworks, and considerations that may be used to develop a specific approach based on the standard being assessed and other variables such as the availability of data. The resulting document provides a starting point for an impact assessment.

A key finding of the paper is that impact is the combination of two critical elements: conformance and effectiveness. Effectiveness represents how successfully the requirements in the standard, as written, would address or mitigate risks to human health and safety such as illness and injury. Conformance is a composite factor characterizing both the degree to which the standard is adopted or how broadly the standard is used and the degree of adherence to the standard or how precisely the standard is followed.

The impact of a standard will change over time. Conformance occurs over time with the diffusion of the standard across the industries or sectors it affects. Products, systems, components, processes, and people subject to the scope of the standard may pre-date the requirements and thus reduce overall conformance. Assessing the impact of a standard requires a structured framework including stakeholder engagement, planning, measurement, and analysis.

Data gathering or measurement can be particularly challenging in the impact assessment process. Direct measurement of injury or illness associated with the specific requirements of a standard is extremely difficult due to the limitations of existing data sources. The use of incident rates is preferred to incident counts, but data for normalization can also be difficult to obtain. Confounding factors must be addressed to establish the relationship between the change in baseline with the measured outcome, or false conclusions may be drawn. Because direct outcome data are difficult to obtain, proxy data such as the economic costs of injury may be useful to estimate the impact of a standard. Additionally, leading indicators of impact may be helpful in the qualitative assessment of impact. Leading indicators may include data on the adoption of the standard.

Topics covered in the white paper include:

  • Existing efforts by the standardization community to measure the impact of standards, and the methodologies used
  • The goals of different stakeholders for measuring impact
  • Frameworks for conducting an impact assessment, including the different types of standards, and the importance of the voluntary standards adoption process
  • The components of measuring impact, including effectiveness and conformance models
  • The relationship between the effectiveness of a standard and conformance to a standard in achieving impact
  • Approaches to measuring the impact of standards, including challenges and quantifiers
  • Collecting and selecting data for measuring outcomes, with a discussion of assessment challenges, including confounding factors

This initiative is the result of discussions between stakeholders starting in 2021. Following a survey of the standards community and a workshop on the topic, the working group was formed to develop the white paper.

“Much has been written about the economic benefits of standards. What sets this effort apart is its focus on calculating the health and safety benefits. Bringing together the community of interested stakeholders to tackle such issues is something that ANSI can always be counted on to do,” said Joe Bhatia, president and CEO, ANSI.

“The benefits of measuring the impact of voluntary consensus standards on human health and safety are significant. This tool allows us to take a holistic approach to standards including necessary resources and investments, portfolio management and effective communication among stakeholders,” said David Wroth, director of technology and systems, ULSE.

For more information, contact Cleo Stamatos [email protected] or David Wroth [email protected].

About ANSI

The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) is a private non-profit organization whose mission is to enhance both the global competitiveness of U.S. business and the U.S. quality of life by promoting and facilitating voluntary consensus standards and conformity assessment systems, and safeguarding their integrity. Its membership is comprised of businesses, professional societies and trade associations, standards developers, government agencies, and consumer and labor organizations.

The Institute represents and serves the diverse interests of more than 270,000 companies and organizations and 30 million professionals worldwide. ANSI is the official U.S. representative to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and, via the U.S. National Committee, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). For more information, visit www.ansi.org.

About ULSE

UL Standards & Engagement is a nonprofit organization that translates safety science into action through standards development, partnerships and advocacy. Since 1903, we have developed nearly 1,700 standards and guidance documents for products ranging from fire doors to autonomous vehicles. ULSE enables innovation and grows trust by convening experts and informing policymakers and regulators as we work toward a safer, more secure and sustainable future. Visit ulse.org for more information.

CONTACT

Jana Zabinski

Director, Communications and Public Relations

Phone:
212.642.8901

Email:
[email protected]

Beth Goodbaum

Journalist/Communications Specialist

Phone:
212.642.4956

Email:
[email protected]